In The News

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program FY 2021 Report Issued

From the Health Group

The Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice have released the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2021

During FY 2021, the federal government won or negotiated more than $5 billion in health care fraud judgments and settlements.  The Report provides highlights of significant criminal and civil investigations by type including:

  • Ambulance transportation services
  • Clinics
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Drug companies
  • Durable medical equipment
  • Electronic health records
  • Genetic testing
  • Home health providers
  • Hospice care
  • Hospitals and health systems
  • Laboratory testing
  • Managed care
  • Medical devices
  • Nursing homes and facilities
  • Pharmacies
  • Physical therapy
  • Physicians and other practitioners
  • Prescription drugs and opioids
  • Psychiatric and psychological testing and services
  • Substance use treatment centers

The Report provides an all-inclusive look into the current and potential activities relating to the identification and pursuit of fraudulent and abusive activities, including Medicare provider screening.  All providers should be continuously aware of areas of focus as described in the Report.  The entire Report is available at FY 2021 HCFAC Report (hhs.gov).

 

MEDPAC Releases June Report to Congress

The Health Group 

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (“MedPAC”) has released the June 2022 Report to Congress, Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System.  The Report includes seven (7) chapters devoted to:

  • · Ways to streamline and harmonize Medicare’s portfolio of alternative payment models,
  • · Vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries’ access to care,
  • · A framework for identifying safety-net providers,
  • · Addressing the high prices of drugs covered by Medicare Part B,
  • · Improving the accuracy of Medicare Advantage payments,
  • · Aligning fee-for-service payment rates across ambulatory settings, and
  • · Segmentation in the stand-alone Part D prescription drug plan market.

The entire Report is available here

 

The Case for Integrating Social Determinants Into Palliative Care

Hospice News / By Jim Parker

Individually, palliative care and social determinants programs both have the potential to improve quality of life and reduce costs — but that potential may be greater when the two are combined.

Social determinants are non-medical needs that can have a significant impact on the trajectory of patients’ health, such as nutrition, transportation, social or caregiver support, and housing, among others. Social and economic factors like these drive 40% of health outcomes, according to the Better Medicare Alliance.

With the care model’s focus on patients’ goals and quality of life, palliative care providers may be uniquely suited to assess those needs, according to Terri Maxwell, general manager, chief clinical officer, and co-founder of Turn-Key Health, a CareCentrix company.

“The interdisciplinary nature of palliative care, especially the inclusion of social workers, positions palliative care nicely to help to address the myriad needs that people have,” Maxwell told Hospice News. “Palliative care is well positioned to be able to positively close gaps related to social determinants of health — if a program is structured to uncover what those gaps are.” 

Integrating social determinants of health into community-based palliative care improves patient outcomes and can reduce higher-acuity care, which can help providers demonstrate their value to payers.

Home-based palliative care could reduce societal health care costs by $103 billion within the next 20 years, the nonprofit economic research group Florida TaxWatch indicated in a 2019 report

Read Full Article

 

The Uncertain Future of Hospice Certificates of Need

Hospice News / By Holly Vessel

While their merits are hotly debated, the substance of certificate of need laws often exist in a state of flux.

Certificate of need (CON) laws have a huge influence on hospices’ ability to expand patients’ access to care, as well as impact the competitive landscape and quality of care in a given market.  

A myriad of factors play into states’ decisions to keep these laws on the books, according to Judi Lund Person, vice president of regulatory and compliance for the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO). 

“It really depends on the current culture of the state,” Lund Person told Hospice News. “It’s the atmosphere, beliefs about free-market economy and all those bigger things that play a role in whether a state even remotely considers a CON or not.”

As of December, 35 states and the District of Columbia had some type of CON program in place, reported the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Wide variation exists in these laws from state to state in terms of requirements and applicability. Currently, 14 states have CON laws that include hospices.

Though New York enacted the first of these laws in 1964, they began to pick up steam due to federal requirements implemented during the 1970s. These federal rules were eventually repealed, and since then states have been left to make up their own minds about CON.

Will CON laws last?

To date, 12 states have rescinded their CON laws or allowed them to expire, according to NCSL. New Hampshire, which scrapped CON in 2016, was the most recent.

According to some, the prevalence of these laws may continue to dwindle.

“In this day and age, we’ll see how long CONs last,” Freeman Smith, north region president for Traditions Health told Hospice News at the VALUE Conference in Chicago. “There’s a real push to get rid of the CON state. It was a process to control the cost 20 years ago, but right now the market place determines that.”

Regulators and legislators in at least 18 states began reassessing their CON laws during the past three years.

Lawmakers introduced bills to remove all or most CON requirements in Alabama, Alaska, Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Several states also enacted or considered CON reform bills, some of which removed requirements for certain settings, including Michigan, Tennessee, Washington, Montana and Virginia. Montana removed CONs for all settings except nursing homes as of last October.

Additionally, three states — Connecticut, Delaware and Massachusetts —appointed commissions to study the issue…

Read Full Article

 

Colorado Health Facilities Interaction

From CDPHE

Last week Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) announced that it, “does not intend to seek another set of emergency rules, nor does it intend to seek to make the current Chapter 2 regulations permanent. As such, the Chapter 2 COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements shall expire July 14, 2022.”

The Board of Health indicated that they have decided to change the policy due to the following:

First, the vaccination rate, as well as medical and religious exemption numbers, have remained steady for the past 3+ months.

“Second, HB22-1401 was signed into law by Governor Polis on May 18, 2022. While the bulk of this bill pertains to licensed Hospitals, there is language directing the Department to enact requirements for all licensed facilities and agencies related to infection prevention and control. While the Department has not yet determined what these requirements will be, the statute requires that they include provisions related to testing, vaccination, and treatment for COVID-19 in accordance with applicable recommendations and guidance. While the specifics will be worked out with stakeholders in the future, the Department envisions COVID-19 vaccination will be part of this conversation.

“Third, while the Department intends to let its state licensure vaccination requirement expire in July, it is important to note that the federal requirement for staff to be vaccinated or obtain a valid medical or religious exemption, through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), will still apply to any licensed facility that is certified by CMS to receive federal reimbursement. Approximately one-third of all licensed facilities are certified by CMS, and therefore their staff will still be subject to a vaccination requirement.

“Key takeaways for licensed facilities and agencies:

  • Effective July 14, 2022, current obligations under Part 12 of 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 2 related to COVID-19 vaccination expire. 
    • This includes the associated obligation to report into Colorado Health Facilities Interactive (COHFI) on a twice-monthly basis. 
  • The requirements of Part 11 of Chapter 2 regarding vaccination against influenza are still in effect and not impacted by the expiration of these emergency rules. 
  • Despite the expiration of these rules, facilities and agencies may maintain any mandatory vaccination policies they have adopted to date. 
  • Long-term and residential care facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities, Assisted Living Residences, Intermediate Care Facilities, and Group Homes) are still subject to the requirements of Public Health Order 20-20 and the Comprehensive Mitigation Guidance document. 
  • Facilities certified by CMS are still subject to the federal government’s vaccine mandate. 
  • CDPHE’s Health Facilities and EMS divisions will engage in conversations with stakeholders later regarding the implementation of HB22-1401, which will likely include some requirements around vaccination and vaccination policies."
 
<< first < Prev 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 Next > last >>

Page 219 of 388